| Previous topic :: Next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Curlie LSST Secretary

Joined: 27 Jul 2006 Posts: 832 Location: Ealing Broadway
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sol Child Protection Officer

Joined: 23 Dec 2005 Posts: 1459 Location: on the river
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ed! Committee Member

Joined: 13 Mar 2005 Posts: 4455 Location: E R, London
|
Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2011 1:48 pm Subject: |
|
|
If you're coming to the committee meeting on Monday, I can happily bore you with details then?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Curlie LSST Secretary

Joined: 27 Jul 2006 Posts: 832 Location: Ealing Broadway
|
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 6:36 am Subject: |
|
|
| Thanks Ed. That's pretty much what the guy in the shop said. He suggested the Shimano M540 SPD or Shimano M520. He was pretty vague on why you'd go for the M540 over the M520 given they wer £20 more, and teh advantage were that they "may be slightly more durable". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ed! Committee Member

Joined: 13 Mar 2005 Posts: 4455 Location: E R, London
|
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 10:10 am Subject: |
|
|
The guy in the shop is coming to our committee meeting?!
With regards to bikes...it's like buying skates - assess what type of cycling you want to do to narrow down the type of bike you should buy (mountain, road, touring, hybrid, recumbent). Any reason why you've chosen a road bike?
Once you've decided that, test ride as many different bikes as you can vary between manufacturers, models, groupset (gears) etc.
Things to look out for would be: you can reach the handlebars / brakes / gears comfortably, and that your position on the bike is also comfortable.
As for shoes...the ones you've chosen look fine. In fact, they're similar to my first shoes. Again, try them out if you can, as they all fit differently - Specialized are wider fitting, Sidi are narrower.
Personally, I would look to try and get something that has a ratchet strap at the top (rather than all velcro) as I think it holds your foot better in the shoe.
Pedal wise, again, depends on what you're going to use your bike for. I'm very much an SPD person as I like the versaility of the mountain bike shoe: the cleat is recessed into the sole, so you can walk round in it.
I also find that with a double sided pedal, clipping in is easy.
I did get pedals similar to what Sol mentioned on my first bike, but found that I tended to look down a lot to check which side I need to have if I wanted to clip in. I also realised that I would mainly use clippy shoes rather than trainers so swapped them to double sided clippy pedals.
On my current commuter bike, I have dual sided clippy pedals, with a wide platform (http://www.merlincycles.co.uk/Bike+Shop/MTB++Parts/Transmission++Gears/Pedals-+MTB/Shimano+Pedals/Shimano+M647+SPD+Pedals_423.htm). I got these in case I did more off road stuff and liked the idea of a wide platform in case I didn't clip in first time, but still need to pedal. They're also usable with trainers, though you can still feel the bump of the clippy bit as it's not completely recessed into the pedal.
On my Sunday best bike, I have the cheapo M520 pedals and love them. Not sure what the difference was between that and the next model up so figured I'd be alright with the entry level one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dan_b

Joined: 15 Jun 2004 Posts: 2428
|
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 10:47 am Subject: |
|
|
| I'd get the M520 without thinking too hard about it unless I knew of some particular compelling reason not to: I've had them on various bikes going back about ten years and never experienced a problem. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Howard

Joined: 24 Jan 2010 Posts: 333 Location: W2 now init.
|
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 10:53 am Subject: |
|
|
On my two commuter bikes I have A530s. They are excellent. They are weighted so that the cleat always faces up unless you flip the pedal over to the flat side, which suites me fine. They look kinda neat, too, and are excellent for off-road if you are not comfortable being always clipped in.
On my Sunday best bike I have A520s. Single sided ultra light SPD. Also excellent.
The main difference between M540 and M520 is that the 20 has a plastic bearing retention system that requires a special tool to remove. In contrast the 40 has a metal assembly that can be undone with a spanner, making them more straightforward to re-grease and service, which will need doing every couple of thousand miles. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Curlie LSST Secretary

Joined: 27 Jul 2006 Posts: 832 Location: Ealing Broadway
|
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 12:07 pm Subject: |
|
|
| Howard wrote: |
| ...which will need doing every couple of thousand miles. |
don't think i'm too worried about that then! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Howard

Joined: 24 Jan 2010 Posts: 333 Location: W2 now init.
|
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 12:29 pm Subject: |
|
|
| Curlie wrote: |
| Howard wrote: |
| ...which will need doing every couple of thousand miles. |
don't think i'm too worried about that then! |
Yeah and if they do start getting sloppy just bin em and buy new ones. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BigSteev
Joined: 04 Jul 2006 Posts: 282 Location: London
|
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 8:48 am Subject: |
|
|
If you like I can look into what deal we get with Specialized.
As for pedals, I run M520s on mine and they're fine. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|